tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post6547255078961549183..comments2024-03-07T02:17:34.434-08:00Comments on Tom In Paine: IT'S TIME FOR CLINTON TO TELL THE DNC THAT SHE AND HER SUPPORTERS DON'T DO WINDOWS.Marc Rubinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comBlogger49125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-46945240151087178402008-09-06T19:02:00.000-07:002008-09-06T19:02:00.000-07:00Oops, I meant he said "Iran is a small country" no...Oops, I meant he said "Iran is a small country" not "Iraq". Yes, I sounded stupid, I guess I won't run for the presidency until I am prepared.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-38801580158673869142008-09-06T18:55:00.000-07:002008-09-06T18:55:00.000-07:00Dear Anonymous,This whole Obama worship thing has ...Dear Anonymous,<BR/><BR/>This whole Obama worship thing has been bothering me. I don't know if I have an answer, but I have a possibility. It springs from Obama's comment when he first became a senator that he would not run for national office because "I believe in knowing what you are doing." For all the sleaziness of the campaign, I think he was serious about that. But he ran anyway. Did he think he was ready? <BR/><BR/>He made the comment that Iraq was no threat because it was a tiny country. That was a massively stupid comment that he reversed the next day. <BR/><BR/>He made the comment that we should seek UN Security Council intervention on Georgia. Another moronic statement in light of Russia's veto power that was reversed a couple days later. <BR/><BR/>He is not a stupid man. He has to know that he is not ready. Someone else is telling him that he should forget his doubts and they would "help him". I just don't see him being blind to his own unpreparedness. <BR/><BR/>Honestly, I believe that the "powers that be" don't hate the Clintons and don't love Obama. They know they can control Obama and they can't control Hillary. She needed to be neutralized for whomever is behind Obama to control the next administration. <BR/><BR/>I have read many posts and the things chicanery in the primaries were beyond what Obama and his official Chicago based senior advisores could have pulled off. There is something more going on. It is clever and underhanded like a Rove move, but required massively more money. I am not a conspiracy theorist, but this is consistent with a "surrogate presidency". A power broker who is ineligible for election - Perhaps foreign born or with skeletons in his closet - working diligently to bring someone he can control into power (Yes, it is most assuredly a "him). <BR/><BR/>The press is not stupid. There is a clear bias. It was bad with Hillary and there has been an absolute frenzy once Palin got on the scene. While it could be something subtle like the memo from Murdoch years ago on making sure Bush got a "fair break" from his Newspapers and TV outlets. But the commentary of late is over the top. <BR/><BR/>It is a tough world. As my son said, "If Obama wins I will not have a choice." I wasn't thinking that far ahead at the time but certainly that is where I find myself now. <BR/><BR/>The possibility that I am right scares me and I don't intend to take a chance with my vote. We will be back in 2012 and we will be smarter and stronger.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-29534723858201693742008-09-06T18:10:00.000-07:002008-09-06T18:10:00.000-07:00I'm changing my party affiliation too. I cant ...I'm changing my party affiliation too. I cant understand why the DNC hate the Clintons so much-worried about Nov & McPlian/Jane tkt<BR/>read<BR/><BR/>http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/09/05/alaskans-speak-in-a-frightened-whisper-palin-is-%E2%80%9Cracist-sexist-vindictive-and-mean%E2%80%9D/<BR/>about palin from alaska's pt of view<BR/>her quote"Sambo beat the Bitch"<BR/>and read below-<BR/> An Open Letter to Senator Hillary Clinton<BR/><BR/>From: Marcia A. Pappas, President of NOW NYS<BR/><BR/>August 28, 2008<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>Dear Senator Clinton:<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>You gave a fabulous, eloquent, and dynamic speech at the Democratic Convention. It brought tears to the eyes of the millions of women who worked so hard for you. One phrase in your powerhouse delivery rings on in my ears. In your call for us to back Obama you asked: "Were you in this campaign just for me or were you in it for all the people in this country who feel invisible?"<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>For some people your question was a turning point. I was one of those people. And I need to answer you, not just because you are my wonderful Senator from New York, but because I want to give you the answer I know many are thinking, but lack the forum to express. You see, my dear Senator, I too sometimes have the occasion to speak for the invisible. In my capacity as President of New York State National Organization for Women, I often speak for the millions of women who are denied reproductive healthcare. I speak for the women who are beaten and abused by their partners, and whom no one believes. I speak for the women who lose their children when corrupt judges award custody to the abusers. I also sometimes speak for the millions of women who feel discrimination in the workplace, and for victims of rape and trafficking.<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>Then, on a micro scale, I even campaigned for and won a contentious race, backed by supporters who believe I'm a person who speaks truth without fear. I was the person they trusted would work for justice in the lives of women and all oppressed people.<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>So I know what you wanted to hear, Senator. You wanted to hear people in loud unison declare: "No, we were not just in it for you, Hillary; we were in it for the invisible."But for me, the only answer can be: "Yes, Senator, I was in it for YOU, precisely because YOU were in it for those people who feel invisible, and because YOU were the candidate who saw clearly that over fifty percent of the population was being ignored."<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>Who are those people? Why they are the poor, the hungry, the underinsured, i.e. women and their children. YOU are the person who addressed the issues of that fifty-plus percent. YOU are the person who worked her entire life for that fifty-plus percent. YOU are the person who, in the face of rife opposition and ridicule, stood firm in favor of health care for the invisible. YOU are the person with a proven record on Emergency Contraception for all women, because YOU understand that without reproductive freedom, women are held hostage to unwanted pregnancies. And it is YOU who has proven, over and over, that you can deliver for the invisible.<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>YOU were the candidate whose followers felt they knew so well, they could call her by her first name. Little girls yelled "Hillary" because they knew their future was in your hands. Single mothers saw hope for the future, knowing that their struggle would lessen under your leadership. Older women came out in the wintry Iowa Caucuses to finally vote for the first truly possible woman president. They looked into your heart, into your eyes, into your soul, and saw something different. And those of us, who traveled around the country, working for your campaign, watched you emerge as a new kind of politician. We saw YOU.<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>Today, your popularity endures, bigger perhaps than even you imagined. Why? Because YOU represent the invisible. YOU persist as our symbol of hope, justice and equality. Please don't be afraid of it. Please embrace it. YOU inspired us, brought us to tears, made us laugh, and made us finally feel that we were not voting for the lesser of two evils. There are eighteen million people out here who are, like me, not ashamed, like me, to say: "Yes Hillary I was in it for YOU."<BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>Marcia A. Pappas<BR/>President<BR/>NOW NYSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-47444973088249851332008-08-15T06:54:00.000-07:002008-08-15T06:54:00.000-07:00I was so incensed last night, NBC news here in Chi...I was so incensed last night, NBC news here in Chicago (Obama land) said Obama made a great concession to Hillary Clinton and will now allow her to have her name placed in nomination at the convention. Of course, he went on to say, that is just a formality. And the two announcers were praising him for being so fair-minded, like he was doing Hillary a favor.<BR/><BR/>Is it too much to ask that journalists (if they are such) should be more responsible in their reporting and give FACTS to the public rather than FICTION. No mention of the fact that it is part of the Rules to put Hillary's name in nomination since she holds 1900+ delegates, and that Mr. Obama is not the nominee until his name is placed in nomination at the convention and all votes are in.<BR/><BR/>Thank goodness Hillary is one tough lady, otherwise she could not withstand all of this pretense, sham and charade. Thank you Marc, Heidi and everyone for all you have done to help the democratic process continue in America.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-86885796117780296502008-08-14T23:51:00.000-07:002008-08-14T23:51:00.000-07:00I am a Clinton supporter and did some volunteer wo...I am a Clinton supporter and did some volunteer work here in Texas. I started to feel like the "lone Ranger" because for months I've been asking the DNC to stop asking me for money and to take me off their email list. It fell on deaf ears, until I strted to get "nasty" and informed them that I never supported their candidate nor will I vote for him. I even had Mrs. Obama sending me emails I never have emailed Obamas campaign site but somehow they got my email address.<BR/>From the begining I never "bought the snake oil" Obama was selling. I live in a College city saturated with Obamabots "youth" of course, naive, easily impressed - yes! Yes even my young nephews & nieces are duped! My family is split because of this man that calls himself the greatest person ever to arrive for Washington. But you know what really bothers me the most, when the rapper Ludicris sang about how the "white house in Washington would get painted black", and how now certain people were fearful of what changes would be happening. No, I am not fearful, nor am I a racist (in fact I am a Hispanic American woman). But what does bother me is the "division" that I have notice among people because of Obama. He is not God and he certainly does not even seem to have a spiritual or christian mind. I personally feel that he could bring more division among all people in our country.<BR/>I am so fed up with the DNC and I could care less what they think and want at this time from me. I have a mind of my own and I will not be forced to support a man that I don't believe in. I have been a Democrat all my life and for the first time in my life I do not plan to vote for Obama. If Clinton does get thrown back into the hat, yes, I will change my mind and help get her where she belongs.........the White House Again!!!<BR/>The black rapper, DNC, Howard Dean, the bias media you can all go "jump off the bridge", cause I will help get Clinton where she belongs. "No window washing for me"!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-25267233727755525062008-08-14T14:14:00.000-07:002008-08-14T14:14:00.000-07:00Please, can we get off the phony birth-certificate...Please, can we get off the phony birth-certificate and other trumped-up conspiracy theories? They've already corrupted some very good anti-Obama sites and I don't want that to happen here on one of the best-written, most incisive blogs around.<BR/><BR/>Even if it's true it does not matter, it's irrelevant. <BR/><BR/>Please.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-81721003152176591482008-08-14T07:18:00.000-07:002008-08-14T07:18:00.000-07:00Dear Marc: PLEASE READ TexasDarlin this morning w...Dear Marc: PLEASE READ TexasDarlin this morning which shows a copy of school registration in Indonesia for Barry Soetoro (Obama) and lists his religion as "Islamic". There is so much information on this web-site to review. Perhaps he was an Indonesian citizen during the period of time he was in school. Indonesia does not recognize dual citizenship, so therefore, was he not a U.S. citizen at that time? Did he ever reapply when returning to the U.S. What name(s) did he use on his Law School/Bar application? Did he mention Indonesian citizenship on those applications? It may not matter that he had Islamic studies (many people study various cultures), but it does matter that Obama has repeatedly and consistently lied and covered up who he is, his beliefs, his background to the American people. That alone should disqualify him as a democratic candidate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-73399450201292926562008-08-13T20:51:00.000-07:002008-08-13T20:51:00.000-07:00in response to your response to my response..Yes, ...in response to your response to my response..<BR/>Yes, perhaps calling Obama an innovator was not warranted (although that snake comment may not have reflected the most sober analysis) but Hillary's (Penn's) effort focused on Super Tuesday and, like Guliani, did not realize the impact of the early states. <BR/><BR/>But since we can't start over would a switch to a Clinton or even Clinton Obama ticket work in the long run? I just don't think so. The smartest move is to cede 2008 to Obama. If the vote is held today he would win. All indications are that he would stumble through four years and Hillary will be a strong contender for 2012. But the election is not today. Historically the race tightens as November approaches and Obama's tiny lead will be gone. Good or bad I doubt McCain will be reelected so Hillary will be the candidate in 2012. The only way for Hillary to win in 2008 is for Obama to volunteer to step back on a unity ticket as VP. His ego will not let him do that so the only way to get Hillary nominated is a floor fight which will embitter key voters handing 2008 to McCain and the 2012 nomination to Obama. I am not an Obama supporter if you can't tell but I simply think Hillary is already making her best move. Stay in the spotlight as a mature and loyal Democrat and wait for 2012.Ushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09607551001732438432noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-40991568497414594552008-08-13T07:38:00.000-07:002008-08-13T07:38:00.000-07:00"I will only comment on one point. 3/4 through you..."I will only comment on one point. 3/4 through you say this was not Hillary's fault. That is in part true and in part false. Hillary was fighting the last election..."<BR/><BR/>what you say is partly true to this extent: Mark Penn was a total disaster as a campaign manager. He was a strategic idiot though I dont see Obama as any kind of innovator just an easily transparent snake oil salesman. But now it is beyond who wins and who loses. The issue now is whether the Democratic Party is going to be honest or not. If they are honest then they accept that Obama does not now nor has he ever had enough delegates to claim the nomination and that both candidates will have the same opportunity to be nominated based on who gets the most votes at the convention. If it is anything less the Democratic Party deserves to get wiped out across the board until they can get some honest leadership at the DNC.Marc Rubinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-69040284523101419672008-08-13T06:53:00.000-07:002008-08-13T06:53:00.000-07:00As friends would say to me when I flew into a rant...As friends would say to me when I flew into a rant, "Don't hold back, tell us how your really feel." In this case you have out done even my best rant. <BR/><BR/>I will only comment on one point. 3/4 through you say this was not Hillary's fault. That is in part true and in part false. Hillary was fighting the last election. She planned her resources based on a conventional nomination process with conventional opponents. She did not see that Obama was the innovator, he leveraged the little states and media support into "momentum" that put him in a position to tie a truly superior candidate. As you note, he did not win, but he would not even have been close if Hillary had either innovated herself (she could have beaten his pants off in the caucus states if she had focused on them early) or responded quickly when she saw Obama had outmaneuvered her. She did not until late in the game when she was playing catch-up. It was indeed Hillary's to lose and she did lose it. <BR/><BR/>I don't think Hillary can win this time. If she "takes" the nomination from Obama she will lose enough of the youth and black vote to lose her chance of ever being elected. If she allows Obama to run it is win-win. The odds are he will lose and she will be in a very strong position for 2012. If he wins it is likely he will be a total disaster and she will be in a strong position for 2012. She is smart and is playing for the 2012 race now. Keeping her base alive, showing she is loyal to the party and American process, showing she is mature, measured and rational, i.e. “presidential”. <BR/><BR/>Don’t do windows, see through them into the future. Pushing for Hillary ’08 is hurting Hillary ’12. Support her, encourage her, hold Obama to the high standard she would have set, but do not embarrass her in the process.Ushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09607551001732438432noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-73988942866581203252008-08-12T16:00:00.000-07:002008-08-12T16:00:00.000-07:00You have said it EXACTLY how I see it. When is the...You have said it EXACTLY how I see it. When is the rest of the democratic party going to wake up?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-46028115064490360352008-08-12T14:27:00.000-07:002008-08-12T14:27:00.000-07:00"I am a little dubious about that e-mail allegedly..."I am a little dubious about that e-mail allegedly from Mayor Chávez in ABQ. He was a strong Clinton supporter. I would expect a cabq.gov address on the response."<BR/><BR/>I was sent a 4 email exchange between Chavez and the recipient including a response that acknowledged a mailbox full of mail from PUMA's since the email was circulated. You can always try the email address yourself and if you get a reply from that recipient that confirms your suspicions you can post it here.Marc Rubinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-12149083895188581592008-08-12T14:21:00.000-07:002008-08-12T14:21:00.000-07:00I am a little dubious about that e-mail allegedly ...I am a little dubious about that e-mail allegedly from Mayor Chávez in ABQ. He was a strong Clinton supporter. I would expect a cabq.gov address on the response.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-63073403164781330162008-08-12T13:37:00.000-07:002008-08-12T13:37:00.000-07:00Cafferty's question for the hour on CNN concerns H...Cafferty's question for the hour on CNN concerns Hillary's nomination and the Denver Group's ad. He's dissing Heidi Li by name.<BR/><BR/>Go vote and leave a comment.<BR/>http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/placing-hillary%e2%80%99s-name-in-nomination/#comment-494770Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-29654484075804155822008-08-12T13:17:00.000-07:002008-08-12T13:17:00.000-07:00It's because of this -http://countusout.wordpress....It's because of this -<BR/>http://countusout.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/1473/ - <I> HRC delegate in CO threatened</I>, <BR/><BR/>and this -<BR/><BR/>"Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell (whose HOUND attempt to counteract the burgeoning Puma Movement flopped at the end of June) has instructed Hillary Clinton’s pledged delegates NOT to sign a petition circulating among some delegates to place Clinton’s name in nomination for a roll call vote in Denver. In an email we obtained yesterday, Mary Isenhour, executive director of the state Democratic Party in Pennsylvania, makes it clear that the message from the top is unequivocal: Shut up and don’t make a move until the big shots tell you what to do."<BR/><BR/>that I sent you a donation today. It's small, but the least I can do.<BR/><BR/>I was never an HRC supporter, I'm not even Democrat. But if democracy is under attack, all American citizens should take some kind of action, regardless of party affiliation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-34556824252802004192008-08-12T09:26:00.000-07:002008-08-12T09:26:00.000-07:00Let's say Hillary GETS the nomination in Denver. W...Let's say Hillary GETS the nomination in Denver. What will the Media who drank all that Kool-Aid do for the rest of the weeks until November? Will CNN and MSNBC have to put up blank screens because they invested everything in The Chosen One?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-76346076078930523092008-08-12T07:45:00.000-07:002008-08-12T07:45:00.000-07:00"...What gets me most is the hew and cry from the ..."...What gets me most is the hew and cry from the Democrats when Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000 but not the electoral college. Somehow, it's OK with these same people that while Hillary won the popular vote, Obama is getting the nomination."<BR/><BR/>I agree. The hypocrisy by Dean, Pelosi, Donna Brazile and those willing to go along with this kind of corruption shreds their credibility on everything.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-29618357234471815912008-08-12T07:30:00.000-07:002008-08-12T07:30:00.000-07:00wmtriviwOn the one hand, it makes me feel good to ...wmtriviwOn the one hand, it makes me feel good to read what so many of us want to shout out to Hillary: "why are you going along with all this?" <BR/><BR/>On the other hand, we only know fragments of what's really going on. I do trust Hillary and her judgment. So this gives me a good oportunity to put my trust in her to test; when I have no plausible explanation and I can't see behind her reasons is exactly when trusting her becomes real.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-1088620093640712622008-08-12T05:24:00.000-07:002008-08-12T05:24:00.000-07:00I'm a conservative Republican and the thought of a...I'm a conservative Republican and the thought of a Hillary presidency terrified me, until I imagined an Obama presidency. That's why I crossed over and voted for Hillary in the Democratic primary.<BR/><BR/>What gets me most is the hew and cry from the Democrats when Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000 but not the electoral college. Somehow, it's OK with these same people that while Hillary won the popular vote, Obama is getting the nomination.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-16488039859065551892008-08-12T04:05:00.000-07:002008-08-12T04:05:00.000-07:00It's a fabulous article. Except for one thing. It ...It's a fabulous article. Except for one thing. It represents a very masculine approach to the problem. "Just stand up and say Dean made this mess, not Hillary" etc. <BR/><BR/>Good idea. And, if Hillary was... say Ted Kennedy..... that's what she could do. And let the chips fall where they may. <BR/><BR/>BUT.... Hillary is not Ted. She is a *she* and the misogynistic DNC, along with it's locker room buddies in the MSM, will be oh so happy to return to the name calling.... "see, she really is a conniving, cackling, fucking whore." And worse.<BR/><BR/>What would, perhaps, be seen as courage if Hillary were a man. Will be branded as hysteria... because she is not. <BR/><BR/>Hillary is walking on eggshells right now. She cannot appear to be behind this move to have her name placed in nomination. Already CNN is accusing her of being at the PUMA helm. Even while she says "vote Obama" until I am sure she wants to puke. Very crafty move on the part of the Obie camp, BTW. To make it look (via the MSM) as if it's all coming from her... not us. <BR/><BR/>THIS IS OUR ROLE NOW!!! We must make it clear to everyone who will listen that Hillary did not stoke our dissent. She tried to brrng us over to Obama. But *we* are not children who can be easily led. And we know what we have seen...... <BR/><BR/>We are standing on our own 36 million feet! <BR/><BR/>PS. I have been reading your blog for some time, Tom. Just never posted before. Thanks for all you are doing for Hillary... and for us REAL democrats.Stray Yellar Dawg?https://www.blogger.com/profile/04861846247063603370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-39102060099294596832008-08-11T22:00:00.000-07:002008-08-11T22:00:00.000-07:00A very good summary of the injustice and corruptne...A very good summary of the injustice and corruptness.<BR/>Thank you for writing it.<BR/><BR/>Marty1Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-70433626583003925902008-08-11T18:53:00.000-07:002008-08-11T18:53:00.000-07:00Saw you on Fox News this morning making the case. ...Saw you on Fox News this morning making the case. Nicely done. And congrats on all the increased media exposure for The Denver Group.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-31298813756375423162008-08-11T17:51:00.000-07:002008-08-11T17:51:00.000-07:00Marc- I missed you on Cavuto, anyway to post the l...Marc- I missed you on Cavuto, anyway to post the link here?<BR/>Also, hope you are planning a nice little essay on Mr John the skunk Edwards.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-84222252362525579582008-08-11T17:46:00.000-07:002008-08-11T17:46:00.000-07:00"The bitter vitriol" against those that caused thi..."The bitter vitriol" against those that caused this mess. <BR/>Next time let's us not cry out against the criminal, but turn on the victim for complaining a crime has been committed.<BR/><BR/>I just love the logic of some folks.<BR/><BR/>Hillary Clinton cannot do this. She cannot win this for Obama and she need not carry him to the white house on her back. Hillary Clinton cannot change reality. The more Senator Clinton tries to change reality, the more evidence there is of the widening gulf between reality and the Obmaland of denial. His responses to the current Russian/Georgia crisis are superficial and naive. Senator Clinton has simply nothing to work with.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-75996410764983891622008-08-11T16:04:00.000-07:002008-08-11T16:04:00.000-07:00Well Marc, I've about run out of superlatives for ...Well Marc, I've about run out of superlatives for these post...<BR/><BR/>BTW, <BR/><BR/>Have you noticed that whenever one puts forth a coherent argument against Obama, a predominant talking point invariably appears:<BR/><BR/>An accusation that one MUST be a Republican operative!<BR/><BR/>It's as sure as night follows day...<BR/><BR/>Sorry...gotta go... Karl is text-messaging his next set of instructions!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com