tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post3123598578364929814..comments2024-03-07T02:17:34.434-08:00Comments on Tom In Paine: Is Clinton Hoping the Same Dirty Politics That Beat Her in '08 Will Win
For Her Now?Marc Rubinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-54234220892726075602016-05-18T14:43:53.421-07:002016-05-18T14:43:53.421-07:00"I always felt that there was something fishy..."I always felt that there was something fishy about Obama's sudden rise"<br /><br />There were more fishy things going on at the Democratic convention in 2008 than at a Seattle fish market.And it's still going on only the smell has gotten worse but this time I dont think Sanders voters are going to hold their nose and vote for Clinton.Marc Rubinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-15569291498387593652016-05-18T10:23:44.443-07:002016-05-18T10:23:44.443-07:00I always felt that there was something fishy about...I always felt that there was something fishy about Obama's sudden rise, despite the great number of Clinton supporters in 2012. I am praying that she "does the right thing," which is what she has been asking Sanders to do. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16831361740262608248noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-83915188911414647442016-05-18T10:01:02.542-07:002016-05-18T10:01:02.542-07:00Thank you for your blog. Great work.Thank you for your blog. Great work.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16831361740262608248noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-72478916965599053462016-05-17T22:18:20.853-07:002016-05-17T22:18:20.853-07:00I love this article. Plan to share it on my facebo...I love this article. Plan to share it on my facebook page. Keep up the good work.Nicole Larish Volkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04323394011588201401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-81551526924665555252016-05-07T07:23:38.870-07:002016-05-07T07:23:38.870-07:00"Wherever Sanders won there was a majority of..."Wherever Sanders won there was a majority of whites although young blacks"<br /><br />First, in case you havent noticed there is a majority of whites everywhere and African Americans make up only 12% of the population so I have no idea what your trying to say. Secondly African Americans are not and have never been decisive in any presidential election so just in terms of numbers the idea that they are is a myth. Gore got 94% of the African American vote in 2000 and lost. Kerry got 94% of the African American vote in 2004 and lost. Naturally any politician would rather have the African American vote than not but its not decisive in a presidential election. And in the South where Clinton won most of her delegates and votes it is solid red state that Democrats cannot win in November.<br /><br />Your last point about Asians couldnt be more wrong. Hawaii is only 24% white, mostly Asian and Sanders destroyed Clinton in Hawaii by triple landslide numbers. The vote in the South had nothing to do with African Americans voting their choice, their choice was to do as Obama asked which he did through the Democratic party establishment which in the South is mostly African American. It really has to do with Obama's influence and in places where he doesnt have the influence he had in the South Sanders wins by landslide numbers.Marc Rubinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-53316262633909407342016-05-07T07:16:10.418-07:002016-05-07T07:16:10.418-07:00" I don't care if they were for Obama or ..." I don't care if they were for Obama or not the point is people can make the decision in the South and they made the decision to vote for Hillary "<br /><br />Your fooling yourself. They made a decision to do what Obama asked period. Had Obama endorsed Sanders he would have won his votes and Clintons. The answers to exit polls were a farce showing how skewed it was. And South Carolina was rigged so badly it was a joke, something I will have more to say about in the future. They South voted Obama not Hillary. They werent FOR Obama they were doing what Obama asked. And Obama's policies are a total failure and he is easily the worst president the Democrats have had and the most unscrupulous since the 20th century. Marc Rubinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-41479524057720210152016-05-06T16:29:13.047-07:002016-05-06T16:29:13.047-07:00I I don't care if they were for Obama or not t...I I don't care if they were for Obama or not the point is people can make the decision in the South and they made the decision to vote for Hillary theyre not cattle they believe that Hillary will follow the Obama regime. I really can't believe that they would rather see Trump in there then vote for Hillary weird or not Trump is our worst nightmare!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04456023403585772020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-67838887711175087402016-05-06T16:28:41.994-07:002016-05-06T16:28:41.994-07:00Wherever Sanders won there was a majority of white...Wherever Sanders won there was a majority of whites although young blacks did vote they didn't vote in the large numbers that just found in African Americans and Asians did for Hillary when it came to a diverse group Sanders loss. the first one he did win with a diverse group was IndianaAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04456023403585772020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-43995695246594869772016-05-06T16:28:12.304-07:002016-05-06T16:28:12.304-07:00Wherever Sanders won there was a majority of white...Wherever Sanders won there was a majority of whites although young blacks did vote they didn't vote in the large numbers that just found in African Americans and Asians did for Hillary when it came to a diverse group Sanders loss. the first one he did win with a diverse group was IndianaAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04456023403585772020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-3008875271542432612016-05-06T16:23:19.389-07:002016-05-06T16:23:19.389-07:00I I don't care if they were for Obama or not t...I I don't care if they were for Obama or not the point is people can make the decision in the South and they made the decision to vote for Hillary theyre not cattle they believe that Hillary will follow the Obama regime. I really can't believe that they would rather see Trump in there then vote for Hillary weird or not Trump is our worst nightmare!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04456023403585772020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-34682367617417939622016-05-05T05:32:20.899-07:002016-05-05T05:32:20.899-07:00"You know what they say about the definition ..."You know what they say about the definition of stupidity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome."<br /><br />Since when does anyone define stupidity as doing the same thing over and over expecting a different outcome?<br /><br />I'm pretty sure you are referring to the "Einstein" quote which is the definition of insanity, not stupidity. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15656879303436382296noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-55083288850341291962016-05-05T04:31:50.632-07:002016-05-05T04:31:50.632-07:00"I hardly think the popular vote is accurate&..."I hardly think the popular vote is accurate"<br /><br />Its not accurate for a few reasons. First keep in mind that unlike Republicans, Democrats do not include the raw vote totals at the caucuses where Sanders has buried Clinton by as much as 80-20. He landslided her in caucuses in Maine, Washington, and a few others.The votes there are not included in the totals. And as you mentioned there is concrete evidence of voter fraud in at least 5 states not the least being NY. And last, keep in mind that were it not for the votes and delegates Clinton got in the South, which were all Obama's influence and endorsement and nothing to do with Clinton herself, she'd be substantially behind Sanders in delegates and votes.Marc Rubinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-34947988878336238362016-05-03T14:37:12.507-07:002016-05-03T14:37:12.507-07:00I hardly think the popular vote is accurate consid...I hardly think the popular vote is accurate considering all of the election problems widespread across the country. Only in states that she won though. Why is that? Hmm.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-72205962275046447332016-05-02T08:52:37.835-07:002016-05-02T08:52:37.835-07:00"tdraicer: Hillary has almost 3 million more ..."tdraicer: Hillary has almost 3 million more votes than Bernie. That is why she is winning, and why she will be the nominee. Period."<br /><br />As I will prove in a future post, all and I mean ALL of her delegates and votes in the South are the result of Obama's endorsement which is part of her backroom under the table deal with Obama for his endorsement. Had Obama endorsed Sanders he wouldve gotten the same votes and delegates in the South Clinton did. And if Obama had remained neutral as he promised the worst that would have happened is Sanders and Clinton would have split those votes. Without Obama's endorsement Clinton doesnt get the South, which are states Democrats can never win in a general election anyway and without those 369 delegates from Southern states and 4 million votes which are all Obama and not Clinton, Sanders is way ahead in both votes by more than a million and winning in delegates because he either annhilates her outside the South or its close..Not to mention evidence of rampant voter fraud in South Carolina NY ,Nev, Col and Ohio. That is why she is winning. And why if she does cheat her way to the nomination, the Democrats could get destroyed by angry Sanders voters in NovemberMarc Rubinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-10839212628308163992016-05-02T08:44:14.642-07:002016-05-02T08:44:14.642-07:00Yes you may share it. Thanks for the compliment.Yes you may share it. Thanks for the compliment.Marc Rubinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-27273381545183079692016-04-30T20:08:49.218-07:002016-04-30T20:08:49.218-07:00I really liked this article and other articles you...I really liked this article and other articles you've authored.<br /><br />Would you be OK if I shared one of your articles with the WriterBeat.com community? I can provide more information about Writer Beat or answer any question, but better than anything I can say in words, please take a look at the site. <br /><br />If yes, just give me an "OK": and I'll handle the rest (there is no fee). <br /><br />Autumn<br />AutumnCote@WriterBeat.comAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17692984934301525727noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-22105931220170262772016-04-27T11:18:52.388-07:002016-04-27T11:18:52.388-07:00tdraicer: Hillary has almost 3 million more votes ...tdraicer: Hillary has almost 3 million more votes than Bernie. That is why she is winning, and why she will be the nominee. Period.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-42959345367830893122016-04-21T07:57:47.930-07:002016-04-21T07:57:47.930-07:00"Might I suggest you are contributing to the ... "Might I suggest you are contributing to the age of stupidity" <br /><br />You can suggest anything. There's a suggestion box at your supermarket. As for here,the fact that you need to be anonymous is the first proof that even you know your suggestions are factless, worthless and made up.It's just an angry rant because the truth not only upsets you but reveals your own character. Second not one word that you wrote is even remotely true and devoid of any and all facts, and third youre just demonstrating your own stupidity which is why you hide behind "anonymous".Marc Rubinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10746456438052849715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3820377390281203107.post-46854067852009695562016-04-20T09:21:50.260-07:002016-04-20T09:21:50.260-07:00Your logo claims we are "living in the age of...Your logo claims we are "living in the age of stupidity." Might I suggest you are contributing to the age of stupidity you decry. You bitched and moaned in 2008 because your candidate didn't win. Now you trot out the same old tropes to bitch and moan that your candidate in 2016 isn't winning. You know what they say about the definition of stupidity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com